Cases 11 - 20 of 92
JONES v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03619
Plaintiff:
ETHEL D. JONES
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2020cv00746
Defendant:
Matthew Denn, Graham L. Robinson, Jeremy L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv03325
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W. JONES and REGINA D. JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv21416
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Plaintiff:
CLARA D JONES
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARIE v. MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 3:2019cv00104
Defendant:
S.M. KUTA, UNITED STATES OF AMAERICA, D. JONES and others
Plaintiff:
NGONO ANDRE MARIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09858
Plaintiff:
VICTOR D JONES
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. County of York et al
as 1:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Officer Patrick Gartrell, County of York, Chief Mark L. Bentzel and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo D. Jones, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ameron International Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Hercules LLC, Westrock MWV, LLC, Goulds Pumps LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Jones and Sam D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. v. Kolter
as 1:2018cv01994
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Defendant:
David M. Kolter, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
