Cases 11 - 20 of 25
WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., CARL A. HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IKOR USA, INC. v. CIMARRON ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05966
Plaintiff:
IKOR USA, INC.
Defendant:
CIMARRON ASSOCIATES, LLC, MELINDA LEGLER JONES, DAVID M. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
JONES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2013cv04485
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. JONES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , ANGELA BORKOWSKI, JSC , ANTHONY F. PICHECA, JR., JSC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. David Jone
as 13-1129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31779
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55162
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv01333
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company v. David M. Jones & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00846
Plaintiff:
MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company
Defendant:
David M. Jones & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32650
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. JONES
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JONES v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32651
Plaintiff:
DAVID L.J. JONES
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
