Cases 11 - 20 of 226
MIKANDA v. SHARP et al
as 1:2022cv02647
Plaintiff:
PHD NEYEMBO MIKANDA and PH.D. NEYEMBO MIKANDA
Defendant:
ANDREW SHARP, ANTHONY D'AMICO, ANTHONY RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goode v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Alexander Edmund Goode
Defendant:
Capital One N.A. and Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Linda Wright v. USA, et al
as 22-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Defendant:
ARBORS REHABILITATION, -TEXAS, DEXTER GOEI, LONE TREE CONVALESCENT and others
Holochip Corp. v. Edmund Optics, Inc.
as 1:2021cv17198
Plaintiff:
Holochip Corp.
Defendant:
Edmund Optics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HOLOCHIP CORP. v. EDMUND OPTICS, INC.
as 2:2021cv17198
Plaintiff:
HOLOCHIP CORP.
Defendant:
EDMUND OPTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00688
Defendant:
C/O 2 LARRY LEWIS, C/O1 JEREMIAH LEWIS, DR. STANLEY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEGRIS v. ETHICON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv11290
Plaintiff:
EDMUND LEGRIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERIDAN v. CANCER GENETICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01267
Defendant:
CANCER GENETICS, INC., FRANKLYN G. PRENDERGAST, EDMUND CANNON and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SHERIDAN
MCWOODS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv00867
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
EDMUND MCWOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRENTISS v. CANCER GENETICS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv17189
Defendant:
CANCER GENETICS, INC., FRANKLYN G. PRENDERGAST, EDMUND CANNON and others
Plaintiff:
STEVE PRENTISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
