Cases 11 - 20 of 288
BATTLE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03438
Petitioner:
JAMAR BATTLE
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Petitioner:
Jamar Davis
Respondent:
Federal Bureau (of) Prisons and Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CARDWELL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, MR SHEEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FREEMAN et al v. TD BANK et al
as 3:2022cv07209
Plaintiff:
GARLA RENEE FREEMAN and GARLAND L. FREEMAN
Defendant:
TD BANK, TRENTON POLICE, TERRENCE GILLIAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamar Gaston v. Lory, et al
as 22-3243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR GASTON
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE LORY, (WCCF), NURSE KEVIN, (WCCF) and NURSE LAVERN, (WCCF)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BURNEY v. OFFICER SCOTT et al
as 2:2022cv05113
Plaintiff:
JAMAR BURNEY
Defendant:
OFFICER SCOTT, NJ D.O.C., NJ D.O.H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNEY v. NJ DOC et al
as 2:2022cv05115
Plaintiff:
JAMAR BURNEY
Defendant:
NJ DOC and NJ DOH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNEY v. MISS KURTZEL et al
as 2:2022cv05114
Plaintiff:
JAMAR BURNEY
Defendant:
MISS KURTZEL, MISS PUZIO, MISS ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
