Cases 11 - 20 of 75
WILLIAMS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00823
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. WILLIAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Shenk
as 4:2019cv01174
Petitioner:
John W. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Travis Shenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDERSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00612
Defendant:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL GILLESPIE and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09016
Plaintiff:
John R Williams
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. FCI Otisville
as 1:2018cv02250
Respondent:
FCI Otisville
Petitioner:
John William Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Reitz et al
as 1:2018cv02102
Respondent:
Warden Earl Reitz and Cumberland County Prison
Petitioner:
John William Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETTAWAY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2018cv00286
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and JOHN WARGO WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams et al v. Toomey et al
as 1:2018cv01687
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners, Allen Welch, Michael Halkias and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Baker, John William Williams and Nathaniel Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00931
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
WILLIAMS v. RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF N.J. et al
as 1:2017cv01797
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF N.J., UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE (UCHC), UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY (UMDNJ) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
