Cases 11 - 20 of 115
KEEL III v. PHILADELPHIA PA 19106 POLICE DEPARTMENTS et al
as 2:2021cv01845
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL III
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PA 19106 POLICE DEPARTMENTS, PHILADELPHIA'S HOUSING AUTHORITY, MELANIE ANDRA ORUSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv09092
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
KEELE ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEEL v. GOLDEN TOUCH TRANSPORTATION OF NY, INC., et al
as 2:2021cv08634
Defendant:
GHI Transportation Companies (fictitious defendants), ABC Maintenance Corporations (fictitious defendants), John/Jane Does (fictitious defendants) and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEEL, v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01633
Plaintiff:
THERESA J. KEEL,
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v May, et al.
as 1:2021cv00365
Defendant:
Officer Hansen, Lieutenant DeJesus, Warden Robert May and others
Plaintiff:
Judeau S. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Keeling v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 21-1369
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KEELING
Perez-Rivera v. Harper et al
as 1:2020cv02257
Defendant:
W. Dreibelbis, John Doe (2), John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Perez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEELE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv08717
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
DANNA KEELE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
