Cases 11 - 20 of 401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Morancy v. Felter et al
as 3:2023cv02143
Petitioner:
Mario Morancy
Respondent:
Scott Kline Felter and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Rosero v. Penhorwood et al
as 1:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
Dr. John C. Rosero
Defendant:
Trooper Jacob Penhorwood, Trooper Shane R. Dressler, Colonel Robert Evanchik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWLING v. KLINE et al
as 2:2023cv01800
Plaintiff:
COLBY MATTHEW BOWLING
Defendant:
WARDEN BRYAN KLINE, DEPUTY WARDEN STEVEN PELESKY, SERGEANT RHONDA CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moore
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Paul Kusserow and others
Kline v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Kline
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kline v. Chilton
as 4:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Cameron M. Chilton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
FRANTZ v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANTZ
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, BRIAN L. KLINE and JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
