Cases 11 - 20 of 982
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1972
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
ATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROBERT ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LLOYD v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER WICZKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO et al
as 5:2024cv01942
Petitioner:
LEWIS T. WATKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin SouffrantIn re: Kevin Souffrant
as 24-1635
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN SOUFFRANT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER v. ALVEREZ
as 1:2024cv04368
Defendant:
JORGE ALVEREZ and JORGE ALVAREZ SANTA CRUZ
Plaintiff:
NAKIA LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Christopherson v. Gourley et al
as 5:2024cv01343
Petitioner:
Charles Christopherson
Respondent:
MR. MICHAEL GOURLEY, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Peralta v. District Attorney Lancaster County, et al
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PERALTA
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, BRADLEY BOOHER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
