Cases 11 - 20 of 839
GAY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
MAURICE GAY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, MAJOR C. SEARS, MS. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. L. Malichaik, et al
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
L. MALICHAIK, RLPM, BOBBI JO SALAMON, Superintendent, M. ROWE, DSCS and others
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ZALZAR v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
JUAN ZALZAR
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, DEFENDANT DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Hightower v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1116
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HIGHTOWER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and SERGEANT SHANTEL MAJOR
CARDWELL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, SHANE DADY, SERGEANT CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
