Cases 11 - 20 of 23
NEWTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv06481
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE AND MARY ROE and ROBERT ROE AND MARY DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2015cv06426
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF UNION, UNION COUNTY CRIMINAL DIV. MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON et al v. TOWNSHIP OF UNION et al
as 2:2015cv06228
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON and ANDREA NEWTON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UNION , THE UNION POLICE DEPT. , DOE WITTEVRONGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Newton v. Disney ABC Television Group, et al
as 15-2549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DISNEY ABC TELEVISION GROUP, ABC TELEVISION GROUP, ABC BROADCASTING GROUP and others
NEWTON -v- DISNEY-ABC TELEVISION GROUP et al
as 2:2015cv03318
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
DISNEY-ABC TELEVISION GROUP, ABC TELEVISION GROUP, ABC BROADCASTING GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPOTZ v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00262
Petitioner:
MARK NEWTON SPOTZ
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and ROBERT GILMORE
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. SHAW, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEWTON et al v. NJ.COM et al
as 2:2013cv06415
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON, ANDREA NEWTON, QADIR NEWTON and others
Defendant:
NJ.COM, JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE 1-13 and ROBERT ROE AND MARY ROE 14-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Spotz v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv01327
Petitioner:
Mark Newton Spotz
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Louis S. Folino and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Newton v. Ned Rosenberg
as 11-1740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant - Appellee:
NED M. ROSENBERG, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY BOTH IN HIS PROFESSIONAL AND INDIVIDUALLY
NEWTON v. ROSENBERG
as 2:2011cv00844
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
NED M. ROSENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
