Cases 11 - 20 of 236
JOHNSON v. REAL ESTATE BILLIONAIRES et al
as 2:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE BILLIONAIRES, UNITED HEADQUARTERS CDC, BIDEN TRUMP OBAMA ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON, JR. v. REV. MOODY et al
as 2:2021cv19426
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
REV. MOODY, JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Nayeem Gordon
as 21-2721
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NAYEEM GORDON, a/k/a Obama, a/k/a Nay
Jaime Luevano v. United States Texas Judges, et al
as 21-1092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TEXAS JUDGES, O.I.G., DONALD J. TRUMP and BARACK OBAMA, ET. AL.
William Kaetz v. The United States, et al
as 21-1018
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, THE UNITED STATES, All 50 States, BARACK OBAMA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05840
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
John Oberuch, Jr. v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 20-2860
Defendant / Appellee:
TWIN OAKS COMMUNITY SERVICES, GEORGE FEEHAN, JR., EDDY COUNTY NM POLICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN OBERUCH, JR.
SCHWARTZ v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
PRICE, JUDGE TONY A OSMAN, C/O BROW and others
Plaintiff:
AUBURN COLETTE SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. TRUMP et al
as 2:2019cv01975
Defendant:
JUDGE TONY A OSMAN, C/O CIARA SINGER, C/O ZEINU TAMIYU and others
Plaintiff:
AUBURN COLETTE SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAC v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2019cv12056
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, ROBERT KHUZAMI, BARACK OBAMA and others
Plaintiff:
ANNA SAC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
