Cases 11 - 20 of 151
DAVIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12285
Plaintiff:
LINDA DAVIS and THE ESTATE OF LINDA ROWLAND
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cara Rowland v. Helen of Troy Ltd
as 23-1960
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARA ROWLAND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
HELEN OF TROY LTD, AKA Helen of Troy LP, AKA Hot Tools Professional
Cara Rowland v. BISSELL Homecare Inc
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARA ROWLAND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
BISSELL HOMECARE INC
ROWLANDS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 2:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROWLANDS
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Arthur Rowland
as 23-1821
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR ROWLAND
USA v. Rodney Bush-Rowland
as 23-1402
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY BUSH-ROWLAND
Cara Rowland v. BISSELL Homecare Inc
as 23-8012
Respondent:
CARA ROWLAND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
BISSELL HOMECARE INC
Cara Rowland v. Helen of Troy Ltd
as 23-8011
Respondent:
CARA ROWLAND, individually and on behald of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
HELEN OF TROY LTD, AKA Helen of Troy LP, DBA Hot Tools Professional
BUSH-ROWLAND v. BENDER et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BUSH-ROWLAND
Defendant:
JEFFREY BRIAN BENDER and ROBERT H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Rodney Bush-Rowland
as 22-3170
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY BUSH-ROWLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
