Cases 11 - 20 of 23
THOMAS-TAYLOR v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, BUREAU OF POLICE
as 2:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
CATHY A. THOMAS-TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, BUREAU OF POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
TAYLOR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TAYLOR
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON and TYRONE GILLIARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HOOD et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv06395
Plaintiff:
TATANISHA HOOD, RONSHON BOWSER, DANTEE FORREST and others
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERIOR COURT OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY and CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Scism et al
as 1:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Thomas Taylor
Defendant:
William Scism, J. Berkihiser and Todd Cerney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Thomas Taylor
as 09-2381
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS TAYLOR
USA v. Thomas Taylor
as 09-2025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS TAYLOR
TAYLOR v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62942
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TAYLOR and THOMAS TAYLOR
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, WARREN PUMPS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2008cv02208
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Taylor
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
