Cases 11 - 20 of 49
STONE v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2018cv01705
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN STONE
Defendant:
FRANCES W. THOMAS and FRANCINE THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
W. et al v. THOMAS
as 2:2018cv00569
Plaintiff:
JANE W. , JOHN X. , JOHN Y. and others
Defendant:
MOSES W. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
THOMAS v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Petitioner:
LANDON W. THOMAS
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
S. Christel Liptok, et al v. Bank of America
as 16-4341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
S. CHRISTEL LIPTOK, NICHOLAS J. LIPTOK, JOHN JAMES LIPTOK and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASHLEY M. LIPTOK
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA
BOZEK et al v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2016cv01806
Plaintiff:
CHERYL BOZEK and GEORGE BOZEK
Defendant:
FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, W. THOMAS MCCRACKEN, JOSEPH R. MARCINEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv08038
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. THOMAS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2016cv01434
Plaintiff:
WILFRED LEE HOLMES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVENOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DIMAIO
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
GOLIA v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2015cv01096
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GOLIA
Defendant:
DAVID W. THOMAS and DAVID M. BUONCRISTIANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
