Cases 21 - 30 of 45
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant:
SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. GILLMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00397
Defendant:
AUSTIN, JOHNSON, CARO and others
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01685
Defendant:
DR. LUCAS MALISHCHAK, JOHN BURT, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TROVY et al v. BAYER U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01438
Plaintiff:
NORMA RHYMES, AMANDA LAWSON, MARLENE RUIZ and others
Defendant:
BAYER AG, BAYER U.S. LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SNIDER v. WITTIG et al
as 2:2018cv00703
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT WITTIG, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, SHELLY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PRICE v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. PRICE
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DAN CARO, COWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, MARK DIALESSANDRO, DSCS, ADAM SEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01198
Plaintiff:
WILLIE EDWARD MCKINNON, III
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, TRACY SHAWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
