Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Nusbaum v. Adamczyk et al
as 1:2019cv00898
Nominal Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas A. Szlosek, Clive R. Hollick, Grace D. Lieblein and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Nusbaum
COTE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv08471
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF DIANA SMITHSON and JACQUELINE COTE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTE v. U.S. SILICA COMPANY et al
as 4:2018cv01440
Defendant:
FB Industries, Schnell Industries, U.S. Silica Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dayton Cote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTE v. U.S. SILICA COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv00835
Plaintiff:
DAYTON COTE
Defendant:
U.S. SILICA COMPANY , NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION , SCHNELL INDUSTRIES and others
Cross_claimant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
FB INDUSTRIES, SCHNELL INDUSTRIES and U.S. SILICA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv01982
Plaintiff:
TABATHA S. COTE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
COTE v. JONES CONSULTANT
as 2:2016cv01528
Plaintiff:
DENNIS COTE
Defendant:
JONES CONSULTANT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
COTE' v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06383
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ARIELLE COTE'
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEVEEL, LLC v. SCENTCO, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
WEVEEL, LLC
Defendant:
SCENTCO, INC. , EVACO LLC and CHRISTOPHER W.E. COTE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
