Cases 21 - 30 of 44,471
GREENE v. WALMART STORES EAST L.P.
as 2:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
SHEILA GREENE
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HENDERSON et al v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
MALIKA HENDERSON, KHALIL HAMMOND, DAVID THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICES et al
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICES, PHILADELPHIA POLICES and D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GREENE v. TOMORROW ENERGY CORP. et al
as 2:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
AYANNA GREENE
Defendant:
TOMORROW ENREGY CORP, JEFF IVY and TOMORROW ENERGY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Courtney Green v. IZOD Corporate Office & Headquarters, et al
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY GREEN
Defendant:
IZOD CORPORATE OFFICE & HEADQUARTERS and PRENTICE HALL CORPORATION SYSTEM INC.
Shane McCrommon v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-1561
Plaintiff:
SHANE LENELL MCCROMMON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Arthur Bomar v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-9001
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Daniel Stoffa v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1638
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STOFFA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, Superintendent SCI Greene, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAYETTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Neil Pal v. , et alIn re: Neil Pal v. , et al
as 24-1940
Petitioner:
In re: NEIL PAL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
