Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CURRIN v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2014cv01523
Petitioner:
JOHN PAUL CURRIN
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SKIDMORE v. ZEPPELIN et al
as 2:2014cv03089
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SKIDMORE
Defendant:
LED ZEPPELIN, JAMES PATRICK PAGE, ROBERT ANTHONY PLANT and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JAMES v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2013cv06584
Plaintiff:
SAM H. JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTONIN SCALIA, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Opoku v. Educational Commission for For, et al
as 13-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL OPOKU
Defendant - Appellee:
EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES, KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, SUZANNE MARTINEZ and others
CANADY et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2013cv02365
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL CANADY, ROSALIND M. CANADY and KAREEM W. CANADY
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, JOHN W. HERRON, JR. , CAREN MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRUPO ALPEAN, S.A. DE C.V. v. DONICO TRADING LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
GRUPO ALPEAN, S.A. DE C.V.
Defendant:
DONICO TRADING LLC, JOHN PAUL DONICO and CRAIG NOEL BARTHELMAS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv07855
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Thomas Thompson v. David Pitkins, et al
as 12-4046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS W. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PITKINS, DANIEL BURNS, JOHN PAUL and others
STABLER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04186
Plaintiff:
KEN STABLER , PETER ADAMS , ANTHONY ALLEN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
