Cases 21 - 30 of 976
RANDALL v. HEALTHEC, LLC
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
HEATHER RANDALL
Defendant:
HEALTHEC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Miller v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
George Miller
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
COOPER v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON RANDALL COOPER
Defendant:
DEPUTY OLIVER, MAJOR P. THOMPSON, SGT. HURL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harrison v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Randall Harrison
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
COOPER v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2023cv04696
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON RANDALL COOPER
Defendant:
OLIVER, P. THOMPSON, SGT. HURL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacon v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dwane Bacon
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Luzerne County Correctional Facility, Deborah Schloss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co v. Randall McMillin, et al
as 23-3069
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO
Respondent:
RANDALL F. MCMILLIN and DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BRAZINSKY v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04064
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRAZINSKY
Defendant:
AT&T INC., RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, JOHN T. STANKEY and others
Petitioner:
GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, BRIDGET N. SMAGALA REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DTD, SURESH KODALI and others
WISE v. POLICE et al
as 3:2023cv22323
Plaintiff:
RANDAL L. WISE
Defendant:
POLICE, FBI and AUSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
