Cases 21 - 30 of 38
THOMAS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2013cv01018
Plaintiff:
JUNIOR ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
THOMAS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DENNENY et al
as 2:2012cv04057
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL DENNENY and ROBERT THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
ANDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03124
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ANDERSON , KARSTEN BAILEY , CHRISTIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen Vu, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 12-2285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NGUYEN VU and THANH THI NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JASON JOHN KEGEL, COREY ANTHONY MATTES and others
THOMAS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, ALLEN JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THIERET et al v. PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY
as 2:2011cv00644
Plaintiff:
DENNIS THIERET , RONALD L. BUCKNER , DAVID S. BENGEL and others
Defendant:
PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Rozell v. Susquehanna County Probation Dept. et al
as 3:2011cv00914
Plaintiff:
James A. Rozell
Defendant:
Susquehanna County Probation Dept., James Hanjaras, Pennsylvania State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEMPLE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64765
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS TEMPLE and CAROL A TEMPLE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen Vu v. City of Philadelphia
as 10-4331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NGUYEN VU and THANH THI NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JASON JOHN KEGEL, COREY ANTHONY MATTES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
