Cases 21 - 30 of 57
SADLER v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv04826
Plaintiff:
BILLY SADLER
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00897
Plaintiff:
David Jaroslawicz
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation, Hudson City Bancorp Inc. , Robert G. Wilmers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Currington v. Thomas et al
as 1:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kermit W Currington, III
Defendant:
Tanisha Thomas, Lt. Sanders, Officer Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KERR et al v. SADLER et al
as 2:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
LOUISE E. KERR and ROBERT G. KERR
Defendant:
DAVID W. SADLER and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
SADLER v. PENNA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. SADLER
Defendant:
PENNA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and MARK CAPOZZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2014cv03437
Plaintiff:
AIDA DEJESUS
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER , HENRY C. BARRIE , GARY MCCRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWZE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2014cv01545
Plaintiff:
TRINA HOWZE
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, CITY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIEVES v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2014cv00833
Plaintiff:
JOSELITO NIEVES
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER , KEITH R. SADLER , JUSTIN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SADLER
as 2:2013cv07207
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT L. SADLER, III
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
