Cases 21 - 30 of 57
BROWN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2013cv00331
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN WILLIAMS, MICHAEL CARRINGTON, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaiken et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04518
Plaintiff:
Irwin Chaiken , Carol Chaiken , Anna S Acosta and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Showers v. Kiefaber
as 4:2013cv01536
Plaintiff:
Aaron Showers
Defendant:
Timothy Kiefaber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Showers v. Finn
as 4:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
Aaron Showers
Defendant:
Patrick Finn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell Showers v. John Kerestes, et al
as 12-4211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL K. SHOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KERESTES, Superintendent, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Hilton Mincy v. William McConnell, et al
as 12-3463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HILTON KARRIEM MINCY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. MCCONNELL, K. SUTTER, ROD SHOWERS and others
COKE et al v. . et al
as 2:2012cv04680
Plaintiff:
LESTER COKE, JIM SHOWER POSSE BROWN, JR, LYNDELL KULLUM and others
Defendant:
KAREN ., BOB MAYER, VALERIE KROMAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COKE v. GODWIN
as 2:2012cv03926
Plaintiff:
LESTER COKE-JIM SHOWER POSSE BROWN JR - LYNDELL KULLUM-EL'AMEER SHAREF LAHAB KULLUM YAGA COKE
Defendant:
VALERIE GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOWERS v. ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY B. SHOWERS
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and JACK DANERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
