Cases 21 - 30 of 116
Michael Gorbey v. Chambers, et al
as 20-3170
Defendant:
MR. BRICKARD, Assistant Warden, MR. FORD, SIS - (SIA), MR. BOHLIN, Executive Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ZIERKE v. SPALDING et al
as 4:2020cv01951
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
Waren Spalding and USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorbey v. Superintendent of USP-Lewisburg
as 3:2020cv01364
Respondent:
Superintendent of USP-Lewisburg
Petitioner:
Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael GorbeyIn re: Michael Gorbey
as 20-2534
Respondent:
MR. J. ORDONEZ, SIS, MR. KONKLE, Captain, MR. KING, Correctional Officer/Appointed Staff Rep FBOP-USP-Lewisburg and others
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Gorbey
as 3:2020cv01227
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Lewisburg
Petitioner:
Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jacques v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2019cv01454
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden USP Lewisburg
Petitioner:
Marc Jacques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blackmon III v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2019cv01383
Plaintiff:
Richard Blackmon III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP-Lewisburg, David Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 1:2019cv01380
Defendant:
C. Moore, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. Earp, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B. Mississigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy N. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 2:2019cv03537
Defendant:
C. MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. EARP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY N. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dury v. USP Lewisburg
as 3:2019cv00283
Respondent:
USP Lewisburg
Petitioner:
Matthew James Dury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
