Cases 21 - 30 of 142
HICKS v. BOROUGH OF NORTHERN CAMBRIA et al
as 3:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. HICKS, JR.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NORTHERN CAMBRIA, PATTON BOROUGH, RUSTY WILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWALD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv04625
Plaintiff:
TROY LEWALD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH HOLDINGS LLC, KIP HALLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHES et al v. WILLS et al
as 2:2022cv03655
Plaintiff:
PAUL MATHES and HOLI MATHES
Defendant:
AIDAN WILLS and BLAKE BARSTAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
David Webb v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 22-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, Government, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, Government, MICHAEL S. PURZYCKI, Mayor and others
In re: Erick Pringle, et al
as 22-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
In re: ERICK PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ELON MUSK, AMAZON INC, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Defendant:
BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW CUOMO and others
Boldrini et al v. Giovannini et al
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini, Michael J. Pega, Jr. and Daniele A. Boldrini
Defendant:
Joseph P. Giovannini, Mary Pamela Amos, Marianne Cameli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David WebbIn re: David Webb
as 22-1708
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, Government, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, Government, MICHAEL S. PURZYCKI, Mayor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCHLIPF et al
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
BRITTANY TENON, RYAN SCHLIPF, BRITTANY SCHLIPF and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
