Cases 31 - 40 of 258
SWEET v. MILES et al
as 2:2021cv02885
Plaintiff:
SHAYNE SWEET
Defendant:
SERGEANT MILES and C/O BLAIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv01590
Defendant:
MOORE, SGT. MILES, SGT. D. THOMAS LARSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOY BULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAJAN et al v. Crawford et al
as 2:2021cv01456
Defendant:
PATRICK MILES, Alastair Crawford, KRISTOFF KABACINSKI and others
Plaintiff:
MATHU RAJAN and Raja Rajan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. RADDAD
as 2:2021cv01116
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL BRYANT
Defendant:
RADDAD, HANDY, KILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROSA et al
as 2:2021cv00933
Defendant:
MICHELLE FERRELL, JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SGT. MILES and others
Plaintiff:
NAIEEM MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICE vs. (PPS) PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, et al
as 2:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RICE
Defendant:
SGT. MILES, OFFICER HALSTEAD, SGT. Q. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 66, AFL-CIO AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COMBINED FUNDS, INC. v. EAST COAST PAVING & SEAL COATING, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01995
Defendant:
EAST COAST PAVING & SEAL COATING, INC., EAST COAST PAVING & SEALCOATING, INC., BARRY MILES and others
Plaintiff:
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 66, AFL-CIO AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COMBINED FUNDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Miles v. Moyle et al
as 3:2020cv02240
Defendant:
Richard Clifford, Robert Rachilla and Margaret B. Moyle
Plaintiff:
Donald Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Gale et al
as 1:2020cv01805
Defendant:
Martha Gale, President Judge Richard A. Lewis, Adrian and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MARTYNUSKA et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
P.A. GOLDEN, C.O. JOZWIAK, LT. ROBISON and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
