Cases 31 - 40 of 12,300
Schutts et al v. The University of the Arts
as 2:2024cv02420
Plaintiff:
Brad M. Schutts, Laura Grutzeck, Carolina Blatt and others
Defendant:
The University of the Arts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
HASCHALK v. RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC.
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE HASCHALK
Defendant:
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CAVANAUGH v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS, N.V., et al
as 2:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CAVANAUGH
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KEIM v. VANZOEREN
as 5:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KEIM
Defendant:
JAMES E. VANZOEREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TERRELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIELS, WALSTON and SURGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KEIM
as 2:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KEIM
Defendant:
JAMES E. VANZOEREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Friedman v. Pocono B W, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Daniel Friedman
Defendant:
Pocono B W, Inc. Individually doing business as Big Wheel Roller Skating Center and/or Big Wheel, John Doe 1-100, Jane Doe 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KELSO v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
DARNELL L. KELSO
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JOHN HARING, JASON COSTANZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
