Cases 31 - 40 of 3,965
Adams v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03012
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC., North America Operations A/S, NOVO NORDISK A/S and others
Plaintiff:
Lydia Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. WHITACRE et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Defendant:
HAIGHT, D. WALSH, C. BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM JOSEPH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ADAMS v. WALMART INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07517
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, WALMART INC. and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brown v. Neitz
as 4:2024cv01076
Defendant:
Lieutenant Neitz
Plaintiff:
Adam Joseph Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Bierly et al
as 1:2024cv01081
Defendant:
Major Reed, Davidsom, CO Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEIF v. DORVAL TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07350
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, BHUPINDER NIJJAR, DORVAL TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM SEIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
SCHWAGER v. BEILEY et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER, CHASE SCHWAGER and ADAM CHARLES
Defendant:
MATTHEW BEILEY and AMER WILLIAM WHITFEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sergei Kovalev v. Laboratory Corp of America Holdings, et al
as 24-2124
Defendant:
JANE DOE I, LABORATORY CORP OF AMERICA, also known as LABCORP, JANE DOE III and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
