Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY, JOHN PASSMORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
BUNDY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05978
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BUNDY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMBERT et al v. GRISBY et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY R. JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bundy v. Target Corporation
as 1:2016cv00475
Plaintiff:
Charles Bundy
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY v. CORYELL et al
as 2:2015cv02534
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EDWARD CORYELL, SR., EDWARD CORYELL, JR., J. R. HOCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: Antonio Bundy
as 15-1788
Petitioner:
ANTONIO J. BUNDY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
BUNDY v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2015cv01349
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BUNDY
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BUNDY v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv00214
Petitioner:
ANTONIO BUNDY
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Desmond Witherspoon v. Kelly Bundy
as 14-4446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
KELLY BUNDY
WITHERSPOON v. BUNDY
as 2:2014cv06678
Plaintiff:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
KELLY BUNDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
