Cases 31 - 40 of 40
R.S. AND D.S. ON BEHALF OF E.S. v. MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 3:2010cv05265
Plaintiff:
R.S. AND D.S. ON BEHALF OF E.S.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
S. et al v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Robert S., D.S., K.N. and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and The Pennsylvania Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARTIS v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2009cv00986
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH ARTIS
Defendant:
PAUL SCHULTZ, SCOTT DODRILL, H. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
D.S., et al v. Bayonne Board of Education
as 08-4730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D.S., Individually and as Guardians ad litem of D.S. and A.S., Individually and as Guardian as litem of D.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYONNE BD OF ED
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. D.S. et al
as 2:2008cv01774
Plaintiff:
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
D.S. and A.S.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
D.S. et al v. BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2008cv01726
Plaintiff:
D.S. and A.S.
Defendant:
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD v. HOLT et al
as 3:2007cv03010
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD
Defendant:
RONALD HOLT and D.S. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
HARPER v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00391
Plaintiff:
MARCEL HARPER
Defendant:
TROY LEVI, J. MCGINNESS and D.S. KULICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
