Cases 31 - 40 of 109
de la Cruz v. Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
as 1:2023cv02147
Petitioner:
Junior Arce de la Cruz
Respondent:
Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MARTINEZ v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. CREANY
as 2:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. LENIHAN
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE LISA PUPO LENIHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. MCCORMICK
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE RICHARD E. MCCORMICK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DE LA CRUZ et al v. SANTO DOMINGO STOP RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
MODESTO DE LA CRUZ, MONICA LOPEZ and ANGELA CONTRERAS
Defendant:
SANTO DOMINGO STOP RESTAURANT, INC., RAFAEL CONCEPCION and MARIA CONCEPCION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MARTINEZ v. CREANY
as 2:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ v. FELICIANI
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. FELICIANI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
