Cases 31 - 40 of 38,919
John Kerr v. Kathryn Peifer, et al
as 24-3058
Defendant:
DANIEL W. COLEMAN, Esq, GEORGE P. HARTWICK, III, BARBARA E. GRIFFIN, Esq and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. KERR
PLAZA v. LANCASTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2024cv05943
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE, COUNSELOR J. DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL PLAZA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv10207
Plaintiff:
RENE' D. EDWARDS
Defendant:
MATHEW J. PLATKIN, LT. PAUL AUDINO, MATHEW SPENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenn-Ching Luo v. Owen J Roberts School District, et al
as 24-3048
Defendant:
JAMES GERL, OWEN J ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, SHARON W. MONTANYE and others
Plaintiff:
JENN-CHING LUO
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 24-3031
Respondent:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH GALFY III, JOHN G. CITO, UNION COUNTY NEW JERSEY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
BOUMASOUD et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv01486
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
Rashid Boumasoud and J&A South Hills Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Akhatsegbe v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01871
Respondent:
Warden J. Greene
Petitioner:
Christian Akhatsegbe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RENTAS v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv10107
Defendant:
J FAJARDO, NORTHERN STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATION, VICTORIA KUHN and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH RENTAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polly v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05754
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC
Plaintiff:
Ms. Brenda J. Polly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
