Cases 31 - 40 of 57
OPOKU v. EDUCATION COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES et al
as 2:2012cv03457
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL OPOKU
Defendant:
EDUCATION COMMISSION FOR FOREIGN MEDICAL GRADUATES, KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, SUZANNE MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAZQUEZ v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2012cv01752
Plaintiff:
PETER VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, FRANCO SYDNOR, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIN v. MEDLOCK et al
as 2:2011cv01006
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL CURRIN
Defendant:
LARRY MEDLOCK, BARRY CROFTCHECK, TIMMIE BURNSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEFLIN v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv04179
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL SHEFLIN
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
John Gomez v. James Markley
as 11-2556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MARKLEY, Officer
John Gomez v. James Markley, et al
as 11-2074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MARKLEY and MIDWAY BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
HASTINGS v. MS. SHINIG SMEAL et al
as 3:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HASTINGS
Defendant:
MS. SHINIG SMEAL, KERR MOORE, SAMUEL J. MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURROWS v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63787
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL BURROWS and MARGARET SPENCER
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. John Haggerty
as 10-4248
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL HAGGERTY
CZERWONY v. POPE JOHN PAUL II REGIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL
as 2:2010cv04526
Plaintiff:
WANDA CZERWONY
Defendant:
POPE JOHN PAUL II REGIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
