Cases 31 - 40 of 44
LAU v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59185
Plaintiff:
WALLY WING YIT LAU
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAU v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36047
Plaintiff:
CONRAD LAU
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAU et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv05815
Plaintiff:
STACEY LAU and KARL LAU
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAU et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81897
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D. LAU
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAU v. BARTOWSKI et al
as 2:2010cv05030
Petitioner:
SIMON LAU
Respondent:
GREG BARTOWSKI and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv00768
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MOORE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, ESTELLE B. RICHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAU v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2009cv01654
Plaintiff:
Devin M. Lau
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Dept. Of Corrections, S.C.I. Camp Hill Medical Dept. (2007) and S.C.I. Rockview Medical Dept. (2007)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAU v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2009cv02865
Plaintiff:
DEVIN M. LAU
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chak Wong, et al v. Josephine Lau
as 08-3444
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAMS MARBLE INC and CHAK S. WONG
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPHINE LAU, a/k/a Xiao Tung Lau
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
