Cases 31 - 40 of 5,647
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02993
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SCOTT v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv02987
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CLARK
Plaintiff:
DAE'ZHION SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRNES v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv07611
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
COLIN BYRNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carr v. Borden et al
as 3:2024cv01085
Defendant:
Randall Hinkle, Sean Borden, Lionel Pierre and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON
as 5:2024cv02900
Defendant:
KYLE RUSSELL, COUNSELOR JOSE, ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
LINDELL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUBOSE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2024cv02866
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Troxell v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-2142
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MIDDLESEX COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND TROXELL
MAFILES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv07315
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
VERGEL OLIVER MAFILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
HARRIS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Defendant:
UNIFIED ERIE BLUE CODES PROGRAM, AUDREY KNIGHT, BRADON DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ION v. COUNTY OF BUTLER et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, PRISON BOARD OF BUTLER COUNTY, Unknown McMillen and others
Plaintiff:
Kristoffer Ion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
