Cases 31 - 40 of 317
COTTON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2023cv04953
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COTTON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
APONTE v. SCI SMITHFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
EDWARD APONTE
Defendant:
SCI SMITHFIELD, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE and MS. GRASSMYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Mark Brandt and Corey Schwalm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHUGART v. PROVIDENT METALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04733
Plaintiff:
Stephan Shugart
Defendant:
PROVIDENT METALS, INC., A-MARK PREVIOUS METALS, INC., JIM BULLION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
