Cases 31 - 40 of 60
LAMPON-PAZ v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016cv09071
Plaintiff:
MANUEL LAMPON-PAZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GEYER v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
JESSE RAY GEYER
Defendant:
SUPT. WINGARD, DEPT. SUPT. HAINSWORTH, ALLEN JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPPS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2016cv00135
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE EPPS
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNIVERAL STEEL BUILDINGS CORP. v. ADVANCE FREIGHT LOGISTICS et al
as 2:2015cv01515
Plaintiff:
UNIVERAL STEEL BUILDINGS CORP.
Defendant:
ADVANCE FREIGHT LOGISTICS , UNKNOWN DEFENDANT ONE, UNKNOWN DEFENDANT TWO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AURANDT v. BROWN et al
as 3:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL AURANDT
Defendant:
CAREY V. BROWN, RONALD BEAVER, CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv01698
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, James C. Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. TIFFIN et al
as 2:2015cv01323
Plaintiff:
STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DANIEL J. TIFFIN, LINDA A. TIFFIN, BRADLEY D. TIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kostyshyn v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2014cv01335
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Angelo et al
as 1:2014cv01066
Plaintiff:
Gordon Smith
Defendant:
David Angelo, Robert Coupe, James Fraley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sweden Valley et al
as 4:2014cv01617
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Sweden Valley, Christopher Brennen, Frederick P. Milliron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
