Cases 41 - 50 of 10,751
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
RA' SHEEN J BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, CAROLYN NAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
PAULA JEAN BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Anthony Quamaine Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Higgs v. John Blakeslee, et al
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
JOHN BLAKESLEE, In his personal and his official capacities, RONALD CONSTANTINE, In his personal and official capacities, LT. BERRYMAN, In his personal and official capacities and others
Lillian Graham v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1707
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS, PHILA POLICE DEPT 39TH DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
