Cases 41 - 50 of 344
CURRY v. WILCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv04638
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. CURRY
Defendant:
WILCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and WILCAC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Echelon Stone CO. Inc. et al v. Adapthealth, LLC
as 1:2022cv01511
Plaintiff:
Echelon Stone CO. Inc., Echelon Partners, LLC and Donald W. Curry
Defendant:
Adapthealth, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Reginald Curry v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 22-3048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
CURRY v. FAMILY LINKS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CURRY, EDD
Defendant:
FAMILY LINKS, INC., KIMBERLY BOSO, DESERAE HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Shaun Curry v. USA
as 22-2594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAUN CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv03411
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS D/B/A SCI PHOENIX, MR. JAMIE SORBER, MANDY SIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Rajeri Curry
as 22-2501
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAJERI CURRY
ARCURI v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2022cv04976
Plaintiff:
LEO ARCURI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PASSAIC, ZOILA CASSANOVA, JOHN CURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CURRY v. BOSTIK, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CURRY
Defendant:
BOSTIK, INC. and ARKEMA INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
