Cases 41 - 50 of 2,736
BLANEY et al v. YOUSSEF et al
as 2:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY and MAROSE REALTY CORP
Defendant:
DOHA YOUSSEF, VALLEY BANK, ANTHONY BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC. v. DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04314
Plaintiff:
INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC.
Defendant:
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES, INC. and DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
IN RE: KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY
as 2:2024cv02102
Petitioner:
KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY and DR. EUGUNE DONALD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARCHESE v. 21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 5:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
LOREE M. MARCHESE
Defendant:
21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL, Andrea Fox and DR. Matthew Flannery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
OFOEGBU FAMILY v. FUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
OFOEBU FAMILY and OFOEGBU FAMILY
Defendant:
DR FUNG and TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
HOFFMAN v. BAILEY
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
SARAH ANN HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DR. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HALEY v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
ALEX HAYDN HALEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL., INC., KAREN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
