Cases 41 - 50 of 85
EVANS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv01702
Plaintiff:
RONALD EVANS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIKE, INC. v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
NIKE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
COLEMAN v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 2:2013cv03182
Plaintiff:
GEORGE COLEMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUDLER v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv01491
Plaintiff:
DUANE SUDLER
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , FREDERICK HARRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Forrest v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 13-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Hill v. Bethea et al
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
D. Bethea, R. Danchise, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORREST v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EADDY v. CHERRY HILL CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv06979
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE EADDY
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL CENTER, INC., JC PENNEY INC. , JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GALLAGHER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv04861
Plaintiff:
JAMES GALLAGHER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2012cv03665
Plaintiff:
ERNEST MARTIN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM HEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
