Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Foderingham v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Glasco Foderingham
Defendant:
John Wetzel , Paul Noel , Brian Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERGROSSI v. NOEL et al
as 2:2017cv01575
Plaintiff:
DAVID PIERGROSSI
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL and DR. MICHAEL HERBIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01293
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PAUL NOEL, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Wisniewski v. James Frommer, Jr., et al
as 17-3164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS WISNIEWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES F. FROMMER, JR., ANDREW J. DANCHA, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC and others
PAGAN v. KORSZNIAK et al
as 2:2017cv03988
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PAGAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH KORSZNIAK, STEPHEN WEINER, JOSEPH J. SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Deibelbis et al
as 3:2017cv01391
Plaintiff:
Craig Henry
Defendant:
William H Deibelbis, John E. Wetzel, Andrew Daneha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marshall Dorsey, IV
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Paul Noel, Bureau of Health Care Services, Assistant Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2017cv00859
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pate
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Paul Noel, Assistant Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department Of Cor, et al
as 17-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORREALE STEVENS, Personal Capacity, JAMES J. FITZGERALD, III, Personal Capacity, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
