Cases 41 - 50 of 2,149
Anthony WilliamsIn re: Anthony Williams
as 23-3037
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KYLE RUSSELL, DEPUTY STEVEN MILLER, Warden of Treatment, DEPUTY ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
DANIELS v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2023cv04576
Plaintiff:
THEODORE DANIELS
Defendant:
KYLE RUSSELL and JANINE DONATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEY v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv22522
Plaintiff:
TAKARA EL BEY
Defendant:
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ESSEX COUNTY, RUSSELL PASSAMANO and STEPHEN PETRILLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Russel et al.
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
Lavar Wade Hall
Defendant:
Officer Russel, Sgt Coverdale and Lt. Russel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dechant et al v. Gores et al
as 1:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Lance Dechant and William Voges
Defendant:
Alec E. Gores, Jun Hong Heng, Mary Lou Jepsen and others
Nominal Defendant:
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv04494
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADP, INC.v. RIGSBY
as 2:2023cv22269
Counter Defendant:
ADP, INC.
Counter Claimant:
WAYNE RIGSBY
3Rd Party Defendant:
NICHOLS TETRAULT, NICHOLAS V. GASTON, LUKE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
ALSAIDI v. OUTLOOK THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv21862
Plaintiff:
RAMZY ALSAIDI
Defendant:
OUTLOOK THERAPEUTICS, INC., C. RUSSELL TRENARY III and LAWRENCE A. KENYON
MARKWITH v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
JAMES RUSSELL MARKWITH
Respondent:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Russell v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 23-2967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RUSSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
