Cases 41 - 50 of 192
ABRAMSON v. CHICAGO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01144
Defendant:
THE WALLING AGENCY, LLC, CONNECTED MARKETING, LLC, THE PROSSEN AGENCY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEWART ABRAMSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHEPPARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv09820
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN SHEPPARD
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2020cv08924
Defendant:
DAVID METELOW, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT LISA SWIFT, SCO. APRIL WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren Kraft v. Fein Such Kahn & Sheppard PC, et al
as 20-2178
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCENT DIMAILO, JR., MICHAEL S. HANUSEK, PHILIP A. KAHN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN R. KRAFT
USA v. Shakey Hoover
as 20-2111
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAKEY HOOVER, a/k/a Shakie Scott, a/k/a David Sheppard
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SHEPPARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv04766
Plaintiff:
JUDY SHEPPARD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Anixter International Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00279
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Lord James Blyth, Melvyn N. Klein, Robert J. Eck and others
SHEPPARD v. BAYONNE POLICE
as 2:2020cv01845
Defendant:
BAYONNE POLICE
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHEPPARD v. SEARS
as 3:2020cv02756
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SHEPPARD
Defendant:
MAJOR CRAIG SEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. Anixter International Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00200
Defendant:
Lord James Blyth, Melvyn N. Klein, Charles M. Swoboda and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
