Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Joseph Pilchesky v. Maggie Barone, et al
as 17-2916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH W. PILCHESKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE BARONE, Deputy U.S. Marshal, JOSEPH BROZOWSKI, Deputy U.S. Marshal and ROBERT LENAHAN, Deputy U.S. Marshal
Jack Allen v. USA, et al
as 17-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOLICITOR GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
JOHNSON v. U.S. MARSHAL et al
as 2:2017cv02236
Petitioner:
RAHSHARD J. JOHNSON
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BINION v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 2:2016cv06078
Plaintiff:
KATEGIA R. BINION
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE , THOMAS P. DALY , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOBSON v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
KASEEN DOBSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BAIK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2016cv03708
Plaintiff:
JOY W. BAIK and KYONG M. CHOI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, WILLIAM D. CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
KAUR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv01755
Plaintiff:
HARPREET KAUR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and DAVID SPRAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BRETT v. SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION et al
as 2:2015cv05932
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION, SAM PLATE, HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICONE v. NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2015cv01057
Plaintiff:
ADAM PICONE
Defendant:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
