Cases 51 - 60 of 460
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BOND et al
as 1:2022cv07513
Plaintiff:
DANNY C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIE BOND, KEISHA FISHER and CARLA GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Scanlan, et al v. American Airlines Group Inc, et al
as 22-3294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES P. SCANLAN and CARLA RINER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC and AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
WEEMS v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03961
Plaintiff:
MARGO A WEEMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITORS, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Centurian of Delaware, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Jenail Brown, Jeremy Cartwright, Jeffrey Clayton and others
Defendant:
Centurian of Delaware, LLC, Correct RX Pharmacy Services, Inc., Monroe Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOLAN v. DOOLEY CONTRACTING, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04462
Plaintiff:
CARLA TOOLAN
Defendant:
DOOLEY CONTRACTING, INC., JOSEPH OSTENDORF, john does 1-20 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Carl Abner, Donna Adair, Jason Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
