Cases 51 - 60 of 71
FORSYTHE et al v. GARLOCK INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60201
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D FORSYTHE and FAYE E. FORSYTHE
Defendant:
GARLOCK INC., KEENE CORPORATION, MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACT. CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
FORSYTHE v. THE BOROUGH OF EAST WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2010cv01770
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FORSYTHE, SR.
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF EAST WASHINGTON and ROBERT CALDWELL
Mediator:
KENNETH BENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORSYTH v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84404
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. FORSYTH
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Alston v. Debra Forsyth
as 10-3641
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRISON ALSTON
Defendant:
DEBRA FORSYTH
Not Party - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
William Alston v. Debra Forsyth, et al
as 10-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HARRISON ALSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA FORSYTH, SAPKO, STEPHEN HOUSELER and others
ENGLISH et al v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
GOLDEN ENGLISH, DARCEL JONES, AARON LLOYD and others
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CAROL AICHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 gg-2 Nat'l. Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA)
D'ONOFRIO v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK et al
as 3:2009cv06220
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN D'ONOFRIO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK, ROBERT W. MATTHIES, THOMAS E. CONNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORSYTH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv75050
Plaintiff:
JERRY C. FORSYTH, JERRY C. FORSYTH, JANICE M. FORSYTH and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Forsythe v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv01932
Petitioner:
Brian Forsythe
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
