Cases 51 - 60 of 851
COLES v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2023cv03883
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. COLES
Defendant:
RICHARD ANDREWS, AVETTE HARPER and DURANN NEIL, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMONDS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
MELISSA EDMONDS
Defendant:
WARDEN HARPER and DAVID URBAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. KRAUS et al
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
HARUN BEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN KRAUS, CHIEF DEPUTY JOHN A. KEARNEY, DEPUTY MIKE FROST and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF HELEN HARPER v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv02364
Plaintiff:
IN RE: THE ESTATE OF HELEN HARPER
Defendant:
ROBERT J. HARPER
BURSE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
TYRONE A. BURSE, SR. and TYRONE BURSE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER and PATROLMAN STEVE KESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1926
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NESTOR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00807
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, INC., ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL OVERSIGHT BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LEE NESTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Rashawn Hawari-Rasulullah
as 23-1756
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RASHAWN HAWARI-RASULULLAH, a/k/a Rashawn Harper
David Wilson v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 23-1716
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN WILSON
Defendant:
USA PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS, JOHN ROBERTS, USA Supreme Court Chief Justice and others
WALLS et al v. K&C EEXECUTIVE PROTECTION LLC
as 2:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Andrew Walls, Brianna Brewer, Terrance Peters and others
Defendant:
K&C Executive Protection LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
