Cases 61 - 70 of 229
Rosenberg v. NS8 Inc.
as 1:2020cv01238
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rosenberg
Defendant:
NS8 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
CommScope Technologies LLC v. Rosenberger Site Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01053
Plaintiff:
CommScope Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Rosenberger Site Solutions, LLC, Rosenberger Asia Pacific Electronic Co., Ltd. and Rosenberger Technologies (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SMITH v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv09120
Plaintiff:
DENISE R. SMITH
Defendant:
PHILLIP D. MURPHY, CHIEF OF POLICE CHRISTOPHER CHEW, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
THIEFFRY v. ROSENBERGER et al
as 3:2020cv07224
Defendant:
THOMAS J. HOPKINS, PETER BERGER, ROBERT AQUILINA and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA THIEFFRY
LAUGHLIN v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2020cv07150
Defendant:
THOMAS J. HOPKINS, GLENN LURIE, ROBERT AQUILINA and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK LAUGHLIN
ROSENBERG et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2020cv07117
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS AND PRIVATE ENTITIES, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HOBOKEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ELTHA JORDAN, RUDY ROSENBERG and JACQUELINE ROSENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAEZ v. FROELICH et al
as 1:2020cv00148
Defendant:
D. VARNER, LT. BEDNORO, MS. LUCAS and others
Plaintiff:
MANUEL BAEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ford v. Aberle et al
as 1:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Donald J. Rosenberg, Jeffrey Henderson and others
Nominal Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
