Cases 61 - 70 of 101
COULTER v. MAHOOD et al
as 2:2012cv01241
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
JAMES E. MAHOOD, BRIAN MCKINLEY, WILDER & MAHOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean Coulter v. Allegheny County Bar Associati, et al
as 12-2988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, JAMES E. MAHOOD, WILDER & MAHOOD and others
COULTER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2012cv00641
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, JAMES E. MAHOOD, WILDER & MAHOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILDER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv01722
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. WILDER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
LARRY BARNES , WOODROW BENNETT , SCOT BRANTLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKELCY v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC et al
as 3:2012cv01014
Plaintiff:
LINDA S SKELCY
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. United States et al
as 1:2011cv01585
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr.
Defendant:
United States, Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilder v. United States
as 1:2011cv01569
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr.
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILDER v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv01083
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILDER v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv05271
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
