Cases 61 - 70 of 412
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv18450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paw v. ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04256
Plaintiff:
Thay Kaw Paw
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC, ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL GROUP, INC., ARAMARK and others
Cross Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA, INC., JBS S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A-D2 SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
SCOTT v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv15790
Plaintiff:
KERIDA SCOTT
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRUMPLER v. PANOS BRANDS, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv15732
Plaintiff:
DERRICK CRUMPLER
Defendant:
PANOS BRANDS, LLC, STACY PETRIELLO, ANGEL DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv15119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wenzke v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wenzke
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv13471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FUSCHETTO v. RIVER et al
as 3:2021cv12742
Counter Claimant:
ADAM C WORTH, CHIEF MITCHELL A. LITTLE and TOMS RIVER
Counter Defendant:
MICHAEL FUSCHETTO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10 and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
